This is what a draft looks like. I post to show proof of work. NOT A.I. it is also PROOF of stake for this CRYPTO NFT !
The art of the unfinished cartoon is a captivating glimpse into the creative process, akin to witnessing the skeleton of an idea come to life. It’s the raw canvas, the rough draft that embodies the initial spark of inspiration. Within its incomplete lines and tentative strokes lies the essence of unrefined innovation, where ideas are born and take their first steps. This realm holds the journey from conception to fruition, showcasing the evolution of concepts, the moments of artistic frustration, and the euphoric triumphs. Some artists advocate a policy of withholding until perfection is achieved, believing in the dictum, “If it’s not good, don’t post it.” However, an alternative perspective emerges: the willingness to reveal one’s process in its entirety. By embracing the imperfections, by showcasing the struggles alongside the successes, artists invite viewers to witness their authentic journey, the rise and fall of ideas, and ultimately, the artistic soul laid bare. This stance declares that there’s value in exposing the madness behind the creation, as it’s a testament to the relentless pursuit of innovation and the unquenchable thirst for expression.
I currently dedicate seven hours per day to paid work on freelancer sites, which keeps me incredibly occupied. Balancing these commitments often leaves me unable to complete my personal projects. While my passion lies in creating political cartoons full-time, practicalities demand my attention—I must earn to sustain myself. Necessities such as a special raw vegan diet and other obligations cannot be overlooked. It’s a bit humbling to admit, but financial pressures loom large. I had hoped that my political cartoons could eventually serve as a primary income source through platforms like Kofi or Patreon, yet these aspirations seem more like whimsical fantasies, and it’s disheartening to realize that I might have been deceived by these notions. Generating a consistent income purely from tips is an arduous feat for any artist, unless, of course, they delve into specific niches like the realm of ‘furries’ with their distinctive preferences. My art is too deviant for DEVIANTART also. Banned also by Reddit. It is not an easy game. The odds are not in my favor. and I am being asked to put down money all the time to these sites for badges and accomplishments, reviews etc.. I hav to give so much for so little. only to see anti trump cartoonists with no history or reviews, get promoted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlgEuJuOhw&feature=youtu.be
Common Law Remedy Beat Traffic Tickets The Law On Your Side Part 2 – YouTube
Few are aware, but I’ve never held a driver’s license. However, the interesting thing is that I don’t require one. The necessity for a driver’s license arises primarily in commercial scenarios, such as operating a taxi. The intricate workings of this detail often elude law enforcement officers. Unfortunately, instances have arisen where individuals have been incarcerated due to a lack of a license, only to later discover that they could file suit and potentially obtain a substantial settlement. This vital piece of information is documented in the “LEXUS NEXUS” and reiterated in the “SHERIFF DRIVING BOOK” of every state. It’s clearly stated: a driver’s license is only obligatory when engaged in commercial activities. Everyday tasks like heading to the store or going shopping do not necessitate a license. Interestingly, during the era of what some term the “TRUMP loophole,” a new law referred to as “HB” came into effect—essentially a legally binding piece of legislation. Congress didn’t openly broadcast this information to the public, but the driving force behind it was the exasperation of congressmen whose children were frequently pulled over. To address this, they fortified the existing law, confirming that a driver’s license is not a prerequisite for mundane activities like commuting to school. Plus if you get a D.o.t. license, you are out of all police jurisdiction. Different law. Plus the TWIC card makes you a diplomat. Its all in the small print. They are not going to advertise these perks. If they run your plate it say DO NOT DETAIN what does that mean? I mean There is so much law stuff the people would love. Lawyers work for the judges. they take POWER away from the people. Remember that. Never ever go to the lawyers for help.
Should you find yourself facing a persistent encounter with law enforcement due to a lack of a driver’s license, take solace in this fact: there’s a potential for substantial legal recourse, potentially yielding millions in compensation. Especially if they give you a hard time and lock you up in the big prison and poison your food and give you a concrete floor. MILLIONS!! WINNING LAWSUITS Happen all the time! Alternatively, you can reference the sheriff driving manual to clarify the situation. What’s crucial here is your assertion of these rights. You show them THEIR OWN BOOK they keep in their patrol cars. DRIVER LICENSE IS NOT NEEDED IF NOT ENGAGED IN COMMERCE plain English! Safeguard your constitutional entitlements, particularly your freedom of movement—remember, identification isn’t explicitly outlined in the constitution, nor have you consented to such conditions. Vigilance against linguistic manipulation is paramount; they might nudge you into implying you’re under their jurisdiction. This underscores the importance of education.
Affirm your status as a living being when dealing with these situations. A strategic move is to protect your SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, rendering it unavailable for financial exploitation. Establishing a private trust is a straightforward means to achieve this. Remarkably, this trust can serve as a mechanism to settle all debts, particularly those accrued with institutions like hospitals or corporations that often exploit this avenue to access funds. And yes, you’re correct—a certain degree of hacking, metaphorically speaking, can be involved, as we’re essentially born with a trust fund. Strangely, everyone benefits from it except you, primarily because you’ve been categorized as a legal fiction—an entity deemed deceased.
“Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and highways is not a mere privilege but is a right or liberty protected by the guarantees of Federal and State constitutions.” Adams v. City of Pocatello 416 P2d 46 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.” “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways… Transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business. “Travel is not a privilege that can be permitted at will with forced insurances, registration, & licensing, but a common & fundamental right of liberty granted by the Constitution.” Chicago Motor Coach Co. V. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200,169 N.E. 22. “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the right to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees…” Berberian v. Lussier 139 A2d 869, 872 (1958) “…to be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrain this movement.” US Supreme Court, Shapiro v Thompson, 394 US 618, 22 L Ed 2d 600, 89 S Ct 1322. “The police power of the state must be exercised in subordination to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.” Bacahanan vs. Wanley, 245 US 60; Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. Vs. State Highway Commission, 294 US 613. “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways…to operate an automobile…is not a mere privilege…which the city may permit or prohibit at will.” Thompson v. Smith (Chief of Police), 154 S.E. 579, 580. “If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it, you can ignore the license and a fee and engage the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 (1962). DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY Title 8: Aliens and Nationality PART 101—PRESUMPTION OF LAWFUL ADMISSION § 101.3 Creation of record of lawful permanent resident status for person born under diplomatic status in the United States. (a) Person born to foreign diplomat —(1) Status of person. A person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to the United States, as a matter of international law, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. That person is not a United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Such a person may be considered a lawful permanent resident at birth. (2) Definition of foreign diplomatic officer. Foreign diplomatic officer means a person listed in the State Department Diplomatic List, also known as the Blue List. It includes ambassadors, ministers, chargés d’affaires, counselors, secretaries and attachés of embassies and legations as well as members of the Delegation of the Commission of the European Communities. The term also includes individuals with comparable diplomatic status and immunities who are accredited to the United Nations or to the Organization of American States, and other individuals who are also accorded comparable diplomatic status. TITLE 22 § 254d. Dismissal on motion of action against individual entitled to immunity Any action or proceeding brought against an individual who is entitled to immunity with respect to such action or proceeding under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, under section 254b or 254c of this title, or under any other laws extending diplomatic privileges and immunities, shall be dismissed. Such immunity may be established upon motion or suggestion by or on behalf of the individual, or as otherwise permitted by law or applicable rules of procedure. 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 Conventions and Duties and Rights of the States, placed all states under international law, thus making all courts, International courts which are foreign to me. The International Organization Immunities Act of 1945 placed all courts under the jurisdiction of the United Nations (reference Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations with Oaths of Office under section 92.12 and 92.31). Under Title 8 USC 1481 oath takers (judges, law enforcers, etc.) voluntarily forfeit their citizenship via the Oath of Office thus becoming foreign agents and are required to register under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. US Govt. Code imposes $75,000 fine and imprisonment for Unregistered Foreign Agents. The Supreme court ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was unconstitutional. Consider their reasoning; Neither Congress nor the State have the power to regulate conduct and transactions of private individuals. SO-CALLED CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes “fraud,” and entitles party deceived to avoid contracts or recover damages.” Barnsdall Refining Corp. V. Birnamwood Oil Co., 92 F.2d 817. The terms are not fully disclosed at the time of signing for a driver license and when one is required to research to find the terms one has been forced to comply with it is considered fraudulent. A fraudulent agreement imposes no duty. Our God-given rights are unalienable by the agreements of men NON-COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS ARE EXEMPT FROM LICENSING “…a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94 page 581. “It is clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.” Wingfield v. Fielder, (1972) 29 CA3d 213. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have the right to do as such license would be meaningless.” City of Chicago v Collins, 51 N.E. 907 (Ill. 1898). NO VIOLATION FOR NOT HAVING A LICENSE OR A SUSPENDED LICENSE or even having a license “…It is absolutely necessary for the State to allege and prove that the accused was, on the date of the alleged offense, a licensee, for, as we construe the statute…, it applies specifically to a licensee and unless the person accused was a licensee, we fail to understand how he could be guilty of violating the provisions of this portion of the statute.” Barber v. State, 149 Tex. Crim. 18 (1945) 191 S.W. 2D 879 NOTICE when the license is active…..that would be when one is actually “engaged in public business”…. But the license is not active when engaged in private business. The definition of a licensee is one who holds a current valid license. Only a licensee can violate a statute. A suspended license is not valid and therefore a suspended licensee is not subject to statutes. “The acceptance of a license… will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.” Collier v. Wallis 180 US 452 (1901) 333 US 426, 606 CL (1936) 56 P2d 602. NON-COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION DOES NOT REQUIRE LICENSING OR REGISTRATION “A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, …it is not a type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab [tag] is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. “It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based upon a reasonable classification, although it does not apply to private vehicles… not for hire.”[ Desser v. Wichita, (1915), 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22] THE DMV ONLY LICE
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/394/618/ RIGHT TO TRAVEL
The Court reaffirmed the right to travel under the 14th Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities clause in Saenz v. Roe (1999).[3]